Search Conversations
Search the sales conversations recorded by Lusha Conversations for your account. Returns each conversation's metadata, AI summary, action items, risks, objections, competitor mentions, coaching analysis, and chapters. Transcripts are not included — fetch those from Get Conversation Transcript.
Two modes on the same contract:
- Keyword mode — supply query to rank conversations by transcript content. All other filters are ignored.
- Filter mode — omit query and supply the structural filters.
Both modes return the same response shape. An empty body is valid and returns the first page of the account's conversations.
Validation notes:
- companyDomains matches on domain, not display name. Resolve a company name to a domain first (e.g. via Search Companies).
- dateFrom / dateTo accept date-only YYYY-MM-DD values. Datetimes, reduced precision (2026, 2026-01), basic format (20260101), and impossible dates (2026-02-31) are rejected with 400.
- pageSize above 100 is rejected with 400 — it is not silently clamped.
- conversationIds that don't exist, are still processing, or belong to another account are omitted from the response rather than erroring.
Billing: 1 credit per block of up to 25 conversations returned (1–25 = 1, 26–50 = 2, 51–75 = 3, 76–100 = 4), via ci_meeting_data_export. Charged on results returned, not the page size requested. A request that returns nothing is free. While ci_meeting_data_export isn't seeded on your account's pricebook, the endpoint stays free (billing.creditsCharged is 0).
Note: summary, coaching, and chapters come from an asynchronous post-call pipeline. A null summary on a recent conversation means analysis isn't ready yet, not "nothing found". A null severity on a risk or objection means the pipeline didn't assess it — do not read it as "low".
Request body
Example request
{
"query": "pricing objection",
"dateFrom": "2026-01-01",
"dateTo": "2026-03-31",
"contactNames": [
"Jane Doe"
],
"companyDomains": [
"acme.com"
],
"meetingTitles": [
"Quarterly review"
],
"page": 1,
"pageSize": 25
}Response
Successful response
Example response
{
"requestId": "3f1a9c2e-7b4d-4a8e-9f10-2c5d6e7a8b90",
"conversations": [
{
"id": "8f2c9b1e-4a7d-4f3b-9c2e-1d6a5b8c7e90",
"title": "Acme <> Lusha - Quarterly review",
"date": "2026-03-12",
"startTime": "2026-03-12T14:00:00Z",
"durationSeconds": 1830,
"durationFormatted": "30m 30s",
"meetingType": "discovery",
"isExternal": true,
"company": {
"name": "Acme Inc",
"domain": "acme.com"
},
"participants": [
{
"name": "Jane Doe",
"email": "jane@acme.com",
"role": "VP Sales"
}
],
"topicLabels": [
"pricing",
"security"
],
"summary": {
"text": "The team walked through the pricing tiers.",
"keyHighlights": [
"Budget confirmed for Q3"
],
"actionItems": [
{
"text": "Send the revised pricing sheet",
"owner": "Sam Rep",
"dueDate": "2026-03-19"
}
],
"nextSteps": [
"Schedule a technical deep dive"
],
"risks": [
{
"text": "Budget approval is still pending",
"severity": "high"
}
],
"objections": [
{
"text": "Budget approval is still pending",
"severity": "high"
}
],
"competition": [
{
"name": "Competitor Inc",
"context": "Mentioned as incumbent",
"sentiment": "negative"
}
]
},
"coaching": {
"overallScore": 68,
"likelihoodOfSale": 45,
"sections": [
{
"section": "discovery",
"score": 72,
"whatHappened": "The rep opened with a clear agenda.",
"whatToKeep": [
"Strong discovery questions"
],
"whatToImprove": [
"Confirm the decision process earlier"
]
}
],
"notes": "Focus on quantifying impact."
},
"chapters": [
{
"title": "Introductions",
"startTime": "00:00:00",
"endTime": "00:04:12",
"summary": "Participants introduced themselves."
}
]
}
],
"page": {
"page": 1,
"pageSize": 25,
"totalItems": 137,
"totalPages": 6
},
"billing": {
"creditsCharged": 3,
"resultsReturned": 1
}
}